Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Palakshi Hanumanthappa Harthi Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Palakshi Hanumanthappa Harthi Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Unsigned Sanction Is No Sanction: Karnataka HC Quashes Reassessment Notices for Breach of Section 151A The Karnataka High Court (Dharwad Bench) quashed multiple reassessment proceedings after holding that sanctions under section 151 issued without proper authority and not in conformity with section 151A are invalid in law. In a batch of writ petitions, the assessees challenged notices issued under sections 148A(b), 148A(d) and 148, primarily on the ground that the approval/sanction under section 151 was unsigned and granted by the jur...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930