Follow Us :

Retirement fund manager EPFO will seek the legal opinion on implementation of the order of the MP High Court throughout the country under which employers and employees will be required to increase their contributions to the provident fund. “We will seek legal opinion and also the opinion of Ministry of Law and Justice Ministry, through Labour Ministry, on the MP High Court order throughout the country,” Central Provident Fund Commissioner Samirendra Chatterjee said.

The Madhya Pradesh (MP) High Court in its recent order said that regular allowances like conveyance, entertainment, medical etc should be included in the salary while computing the 12 per cent contribution to provident fund.

At present, the provident fund contribution, which is mandatory for all employees, forms 12 per cent of the basic pay. Employer is also required to contribute the matching amount.

The court order would be implemented by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) in Madhya Pradesh, Chatterjee said, adding the decision on extending it across the country would be taken after seeking the legal opinion.

The implementation of the order will put extra burden on employer and reduce the take home salary of the employee, as both will be required to enhance their contribution to the retirement fund.

On the positive side, the decision will significantly enhance the corpus of the EPFO, which has recently appointed four fund managers to manage its Rs 3.5 lakh crore, and enhance better returns at the time of retirement for its 4.72 crore subscribers.

Related Posts-

1. Splitting of Minimum Wages for the purpose of PF contribution not permissible

2. EPFO – Forwarding of Landmark Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court on the issue of considerable components of Basic Wages

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. parameswaran says:

    Sir
    The Hon’ble MP High court did not think that if a person paying his House Rent to the landlord after deducting 12% .or the person expensing his conveyance he will deduct 12% Is it any logic?

  2. A S KOhli says:

    It is really a much-needed and fair landmark judgement of the M.P. High Court and should be vetted by the Supreme Court to make it valid all over the country.
    It should have come much earlier.
    Anyway better delayed than never.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031