Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

Comparison of Rival marks has to be done as a whole and could not be dissected under Trademarks Act

Case Law Details

Case Name
Dolphin Mart Private Limited Vs Avenue Supermarts Limited & Anr (Delhi High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Dolphin Mart Private Limited Vs Avenue Supermarts Limited & Anr (Delhi High Court) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court while considering the application under Trademarks Act have observed that it is well settled that a composite trademark is not to be dissected to determine whether there is any deceptive similarity with the impugned trademark and comparison has to be by taking the rival marks as a whole. Facts: In present facts of the case, the Plaintiff Company have the trademark d’mart Exclusif which includes home décor and gifting solut...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *