This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Comparison of Rival marks has to be done as a whole and could not be dissected under Trademarks Act
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dolphin Mart Private Limited Vs Avenue Supermarts Limited & Anr (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Dolphin Mart Private Limited Vs Avenue Supermarts Limited & Anr (Delhi High Court)
Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court while considering the application under Trademarks Act have observed that it is well settled that a composite trademark is not to be dissected to determine whether there is any deceptive similarity with the impugned trademark and comparison has to be by taking the rival marks as a whole.
Facts: In present facts of the case, the Plaintiff Company have the trademark d’mart Exclusif which includes home décor and gifting solut...





