Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board & Anr. Vs. M/s. Prakash Dal Mill & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal Nos. 5406 -5445 Of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/04/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board was wrong in raising the price of industrial plots arbitrarily, the Supreme Court stated while dismissing its appeal against the high court ruling. The board had allotted plots after receiving payment. But 13 years later, it asked the allottees to pay more. This was challenged by the allottees. The board claimed that it has power under the rules to raise the demand. The high court rejected this stand. The Supreme Court also underlined that though the rules may grant undefined power to fix the final price, the power would have to be exercised “in accordance with the principle of rationality and reasonableness.”

Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board & ANR. Vs. M/s. Prakash Dal Mill & Ors.

SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J.

1. The instant appeals are preferred against the final order and judgment of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in W.A. Nos. 2183 to 2221 of 2000 & W.A. No. 1492 of 2000 dated 18th February, 2003 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court allowed the writ appeal by setting aside the judgment of the High Court in W.P. Nos. 23578 to 23617 of 1999 dated 7th July, 1999.

2. We may now briefly notice the relevant facts which are necessary for the adjudication of the present case. The Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (hereinafter referred to as `appellant No.1) had formed an industrial layout at Tarihal village in the year 1983, pursuant to which, it invited interested purchasers to make applications for allotment of industrial sites. Pursuant to the same, the respondents herein, applied for the allotment of sites. It is a matter of record that the respondents had applied for the allotment of sites at different points of time. Consequently, the appellant issued letters of intent, indicating that it had resolved to allot all respondents the sites shown in their cause titles at Tarihal Industrial Estate. The said letter also indicated the tentative price at which the land was sought to be allotted.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Rajkumar Majhi says:

    Nice Articles I am truly motivated while reading your Articles thanks for providing valuable Articles to us, once again thanks

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031