This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Anticipatory Bail denied as details of consideration pertaining to sale deed was missing: SC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pratibha Manchanda Vs State of Haryana (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Pratibha Manchanda Vs State of Haryana (Supreme Court of India)
Conclusion: In present case, the Hon’ble Apex Court quashed the anticipatory bail filed under section 438 of the CrPC wherein the details pertaining to PAN Number and TDS were missing for the registration of sale deed and there was no source of transaction of consideration for the purchase of land even when the property in dispute was highly undervalued.
Facts: In present facts of the case, the instant appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court, where anticipatory bail under Section 438 of CrPC was granted to Respondent No....
Author Info
