Penalty Imposed by MCA for Delay in Filing Annual Return (MGT-7)

Company ought to have held its AGM for the financial year 2020-2021 on or before 30.9.2021 and filed its Annual Return (MGT-7) before MCA on or before 11.2021. However the company got extension upto 31.12.2021 and ought to have filed its Annual Return (MGT-7) before MCA on or before 01.03.2022, but the company had held its AGM on 11.05.2022 and has filed its MGT-7 vide SRN F09933169 on 27.06.2022 and thereby contravened the Provisions of Section 92(4) of Companies Act, 2013 during the period from 02.03.2022 to 27.06.2022 (with a delay of 118 Days). Therefore in view of the above said non-compliance for the violation of Section 92(4 ) of the Companies Act. 2013 under Section 92(5) of the Companies Act 2013 hereby impose penalty.

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, TAMIL NADU
SHASTRI BHAVAN, II FLOOR, 26, HADDOWS ROAD, CHENNAI-6.

********

Order F.NO.ROC/ CHN/ CMBF TRADING /ADJ Order / S.92 (4) /2023 Date: 14.06.2023

ORDER OF ADJUDICATION OF PENALTY UNDER SECTION 454 OF COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 3 OF THE COMPANIES (ADJUDICATION OF PENALITES) RULES 2014 FOR VIOLATION OF PROVISIONS OF SECTION 92(4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 BY M/S CMBF TRADING AND MANUFACTURING  INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED.

1. In the matter of M/s CMBF TRADING AND MANUFACTURING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED  incorporated on 15.12.2008 under the jurisdiction of Registrar of Companies, Chennai with the registered office situated at PLOT NO. A-9, SIPCOT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PILLAIPAKKAM, SRIPERUMBUDUR, CHENNAI – 602 105.

2. Whereas pursuant to sub-section (4) of section 92 which read as under :-

“Every company shall _.file with the Registrar a copy of the Annual Return within sixty days from the date on which the annual general meeting is held or where no annual general meeting is held in any year within sixty days from the date on which the annual general meeting should have been held together with the statement specifying the reasons for not holding the annual general meeting, with such fees or additional fees as may be prescribed, as envisaged in the Act, 2013.”

3. Whereas the Company ought to have held its AGM for the financial year 2020-2021 on or before 30.9.2021 and filed its Annual Return (MGT-7) before MCA on or before 11.2021. However the company got extension upto 31.12.2021 and ought to have filed its Annual Return (MGT-7) before MCA on or before 01.03.2022, but the company had held its AGM on 11.05.2022 and has filed its MGT-7 vide SRN F09933169 on 27.06.2022 and thereby contravened the Provisions referred to Para No.2 Supra during the period from 02.03.2022 to 27.06.2022 (with a delay of 118 Days).

4. Whereas this office had issued Adjudication Hearing Notice to the Company and its Directors on 12.05.2023 fixing the hearing date as 18/05/2023 on the basis of the Suo-motto application of the company and its officers on 25/11/2022. The Company and its Directors appeared before the undersigned on 18.05.2023.

5. Pursuant to hearing notice issued to the compan^y and its directors vide dated I 2.05.2023. Shri. Venkatesh Prasad. (Practicing Company Secretary). Authorized Representative appeared before the undersigned and made submissions that. ^“the Said ViOlaii011 17101′ be

6. Whereas on the basis of Suo-motto application received for Adjudication of offences u/s 454 of the Act r/w Companies (Adjudication of Penalty), Rules 2014. has been verified in the light of the latest Companies Amendment Act, 2020 wherein, Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013. particularly sub section 3 and its proviso states that;

“The adjudicating officer may, by an order –

(a) Impose the penalty on the company, the officer who is in default, or any other person, as the case may be, stating therein any non-compliance or default under the relevant provisions of this Act; and

(b) Direct such company, or officer who is in default or any other person, as the case may be, to rectify the default, wherever he considers fit.

“Provided that in case the default relates to non-compliance of sub-section 4 of Section 92 or sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of section 137 and such default has been rectified either prior to, or within thirty days of the issue of the notice by the adjudicating officer, no penalty shall be imposed in this regard and all proceedings under this section in respect of such default shall be deemed to be concluded “

7. Whereas on examination of the representation filed hereto by the parties with reference to the provisio added vide the said Amendment Act, 2020 it is noted that the subject company has complied the default provisions of Section 92(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 and submitted their documents filed the e-forms before MCA and accordingly the company has filed E-form MGT-7 vide SRN F09933169 on 27.06.2022. As, it is observed that the company has filed e-form MGT-7 on 27.06.2022 hence the company and its directors are liable for penalty.

8. Whereas per section 92 (5) of the Companies Act, 2013, which read as under:-

“If any company fails to file its annual return under sub-section (4), before the expiry of the period specified therein, such company and its every officer who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees and in case of continuing failure, with a further penalty of one hundred rupees for each day after the first during which such failure continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default.”

9. Therefore in view of the above said non-compliance for the violation of Section 92(4 ) of the Companies Act. 2013 under Section 92(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 hereby impose a penalty:

(Totalling Rs.1,09,000/- as penalty amount) for non compliance of Section 92(4) of the Companies Act, 2013.

10. Whereas sub-section (5) of section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that, “Any person aggrieved by an order made by the adjudicating officer under sub-section (3) may prefer an appeal to the Regional Director having jurisdiction in the matter.” Further sub-section(6) provides that, “Every appeal under sub-section(5) shall be filed within sixty days form the date on which the copy of the order made by the adjudicating officer is received by the aggrieved person and shall be in such form, manner and be accompanied by such fees as may be prescribed.”

11. Please note that as per Section 454(8) (i) of the Companies Act, 2013, which read as under:-

i. “Where company does not pay the penalty imposed by the adjudicating officer or the Regional Director within a period of ninety days from the date of the receipt of the copy of the order, the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees.”

ii. “Where an officer of a company who is in default does not pay the penalty within a period of ninety days from the date of the receipt of the copy of the order, such officer shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six months or with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both.”

In case of default in pa^yment of penalty. prosecution w ill be filed under section 454(8) (i) and (ii) of the Companies Act. 2013 at \ our own costs without an further notice. Alongwith the penalty to be imposed and the same should be submitted.

(K. LATHA PARIMALA ADANA, ICLS)
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
ADJUDICATING OFFICER
TAM ILNADU, CHENNAI.