Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : A detailed guide to LLP incorporation covering RUN-LLP, Form FILLIP, Form LLP-3, required documents, CRC approval and post-incorpo...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC quashed demolition proceedings, adopted Supreme Court directions, and issued further directions governing demolition ...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC examined criminal cases against advocates, Bar Council processes, verification issues, and issued compliance directio...
Corporate Law : Explains extra-judicial killings, constitutional and statutory provisions, Supreme Court guidelines and the legal framework govern...
Corporate Law : Explains the role, composition and functions of Safety Committees under Section 22 of the OSH Code, 2020 and the OSH Central Rules...
Corporate Law : CCPA begins action against 41 restaurants over default service charges, citing consumer complaints, 2022 Guidelines and the Consum...
Corporate Law : CBI filed its 16th chargesheet in a homebuyers fraud investigation alleging conspiracy, cheating and criminal breach of trust invo...
Corporate Law : DPIIT amends footwear QCOs by extending legacy stock clearance to 31 July 2027 and permitting annual import of 4,500 footwear samp...
Corporate Law : PIB issues a detailed FAQ on the Ethanol Blended Petrol Programme covering policy evolution, E20 rollout, vehicle compatibility, p...
Corporate Law : PIB outlines Indias E20 ethanol blending progress, programme milestones, industry views, and responses to frequently raised concer...
Corporate Law : DRAT declined to condone a 2417-day delay, holding the delay remained unexplained, and rejected the appeal against the DRT recover...
Corporate Law : CCPA held the 50,000-hour LED claim misleading for lacking product-level substantiation, ordered its discontinuation, and impose...
Corporate Law : CCPA imposed a ₹10 lakh penalty on TradeIndia for walkie-talkie listings lacking mandatory regulatory disclosures and directed f...
Corporate Law : CCPA imposed a ₹10 lakh penalty on Amazon over walkie-talkie listings lacking mandatory regulatory disclosures and directed comp...
Corporate Law : Kerala HC upheld rejection of education loans based on a parent's low credit score under the extant IBA Scheme but allowed fresh c...
Corporate Law : BCI directs State Bar Councils and law colleges to immediately implement its Circular on social media conduct, digital ethics and ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an Insolvency Professional's registration over CIRP compliance lapses, disclosure failures and Code violations in t...
Corporate Law : FSSAI amends the notified food laboratory list, updating accredited laboratories, registrations and scopes across multiple States ...
Corporate Law : PFRDA notifies Regulatory Sandbox Regulations, 2026 enabling controlled testing with limited relaxations while protecting subscrib...
Corporate Law : PFRDAs 2026 amendment allows Pension Funds to engage entities for specific purpose schemes under NPS, subject to Authority guideli...
Paragraph 27AA of the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) Scheme could not be automatically imposed on establishments exempted under Section 17 of the EPF Act unless the Appropriate Government issued a specific official notification modifying the conditions of such exemption.
The amendment introduces a new category of IFSC-based LLPs with specific regulatory provisions. It enables foreign currency operations and aligns LLPs with global financial practices.
The Court examined whether successive review petitions were maintainable. It held that without new evidence or error apparent, a second review is impermissible and restored the original judgment.
The Court examined whether review jurisdiction permits re-evaluation of evidence. It held that such reappreciation is impermissible and restored the original writ judgment.
The Court examined whether review powers were properly exercised. It held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by re-evaluating evidence, restoring the original findings.
The issue concerns whether startups can sell regulated products without BIS certification. It is established that certification is mandatory under QCOs, and non-compliance can lead to penalties, bans, or closure.
Supreme Court held that post repeal of SICA and non-invocation of IBC, Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd. (GDCL) didn’t possess ownership rights to sell assets of Jaipur Udyog Ltd (JUL). Further, Court directed to verify and make payment of long-standing dues of workers of JUL.
Startups must obtain BIS certification for regulated products under mandatory Quality Control Orders. Compliance ensures legal operations and enhances customer confidence.
The Court ruled that making unverified allegations against judicial officers amounts to criminal contempt. It emphasized that criticism must be evidence-based and not undermine judicial authority.
The issue was whether an insolvency professional fulfilled due diligence obligations under Section 29A. The Committee held that failure to verify and disclose disqualification of a wilful defaulter invalidated the process. It emphasized that eligibility must be continuously assessed and cannot be ignored at later stages.
