Explore the detailed analysis of ITO Vs Axisline Investment Consultants Pvt. Ltd. case where ITAT Kolkata deleted Rs. 1.54 crore addition for share capital under Section 68.
ITAT Kolkata held in ITO Vs Happy Structure Pvt. Ltd. that share application amount cannot be added twice under Section 68 of Income Tax Act in in payees & recipients’ hands u/s 68
Satyam Smertex pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata): Addition made by AO and confirmed by CIT(A) are based on conjectures and surmises, so their impugned action cannot be justified.
Discover the ITAT Chennai verdict on Santhilal Jain Vijay Kumar Vs ITO, addressing taxation on excess stock and unexplained marriage expenses. Read the full case analysis.
Read the detailed analysis of the Rajasthan High Court’s judgment in Jugal Kishore Lohiya vs Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, focusing on Sections 148 and 148A.
Explore the detailed analysis of Chetak Enterprises Ltd. Vs ACIT Rajasthan High Court judgment on reopening assessments under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act. Understand the implications and legal nuances.
Explore the detailed analysis of Vinodkumar Lakshmipathi appeal against CIT(A) NFAC regarding foreign tax credit disallowance for AY 2018-19. Understand the implications and legal nuances.
Discover the ITAT Kolkata ruling on Surendra Steels vs DCIT, addressing the disallowance of 80IC deduction due to procedural issues and audit report delays.
ITAT’s judgment in the case of Eastman Industries Ltd. Vs ACIT addressed critical procedural issues related to the late deposit of employees’ provident fund contributions and the submission of Form 67 for claiming FTC.
CIT Vs Reliance Industries Ltd (Supreme Court of India) The Supreme Court of India adjudicated the appeals filed by the Revenue against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 22 & 23 August 2017 for the assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, and 2006-07. The case dealt with multiple significant questions of law, including the […]