"I am s/o J.K.Jain , Jaipur & is Writer & Analyst of Fortnightly magazine "J.K.Jain's GST & VR". Extended Consultation work of GST. Expert in Commentary of GST/VAT. My e-mail ID is [email protected] & Tel No. is 9414300730/9462749040/0141-3584043. Analytical interpretation of GST Act/Rules alongwith constitutional validity of each section of GST Act "
Supreme Court rules royalty payments for mining rights are not subject to GST. Key judgments and implications discussed.
Explore the constitutional validity of conditions attached to the levy of GST on Royalty Collection Contractors. Delve into the analysis of Entry No. 65B of Notification No. 14/2018-Central Taxes (Rate) and understand the implications of the GST exemption for Excess Royalty Collection Contractors. Stay informed with insights and expert views on this matter.
Unraveling the complexities of GST on minerals royalty! Dive into the constitutional validity of entry No. 5 of notfn 13/2017-CT(R) and recent legal developments. Explore the impact on mining leases, the definition of supply, and the ongoing judicial scrutiny. Stay informed with expert analysis.
Deptt. is issuing demand notices for levy of Late Fee & Penalty, where Reconciliation Statement in Form 9C is not submitted along with Annual Return GSTR-9 (submitted by due date) but submitted after the due date.
Affiliation granted to colleges for imparting education is not exempt vide entry No.66 of notfn No.12/2017-CT(R) dated 28.6.2017 and Affiliation in relation to a college is an activity to recognize such college to the privileges of the university to which the institution is affiliated.
ARA were of the view that the activities to be undertaken by the applicant in respect of Operation & Maintenance of Mansi Wakal dam is a single supply and cannot be treated as distinct supplies.
Analyzing the Constitutional Validity of condition Nos. 4.3 and 4.7 of CBIC Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST and its impact on Transitional Credit.
In the case of Munjaal Manishbhai Bhatt v. Union of India, the High Court questioned the validity of the deduction of 1/3rd of the total consideration towards the value of land in construction services under GST. The court argued that such mandatory deductions cannot be prescribed through notification as the GST Act doesn’t permit it. However, a recent Supreme Court decision in Union of India v. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. supports the issuance of notifications for determining the value of supply, citing a reasonable means consistent with GST principles.
AAAR held that RUDSICO is not a Governmental Authority. Therefore, appellant is not eligible for exemption under notfn No.12/2017-CT(R) dated 28.6.2017.
The Govt. is sending ‘Intimation on DRC-1 for payment of 18% GST on Reverse charge basis on Royalty paid on mining lease’, under HSN code 997337.
