High Court After Taking Cognizance of Delayed Disposal of Appeals under Faceless Appeal Scheme, 2020 Directed Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) On Account of Principles of Natural Justice To Decide Appeal Expeditiously Within 12 Weeks.
ITAT Chandigarh addresses limitations, record definition, and right to be heard in Amrik Singh Bhullar Vs ITO case. Important insights for taxpayers.
The main issue in this appeal is whether loss from sale of long term capital share on which security transaction tax has been paid should be allowed to be carried forward for set off even though the income from such transfer of long term capital asset is exempt u/ s 10 (38).
It is undisputed fact that the consideration is paid to individuals who had experience in the business of consultancy for not to engage themselves in similar kind of business and activities for a period of 3 years. It is also not disputed that such consideration is independent and not part of the cost of acquisition of business paid to shareholders.
Shree Samruddhi Overseas Trading Co. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is submitted on behalf of the assessee that the assessee had taken a temporary loan of Rs.8 Lakhs and Rs.2 Lakhs aggregating Rs.10,00,000/- in the month of June 2012 from Shri Rakesh Vallabhbhai Swadia. The loan so obtained was also repaid in the month of […]
Raj Arivazhagan Vs ITO (Madras High Court) In the case on hand, the petitioner had raised a specific objection that the proposal for reopening the assessment is liable to be dropped, since there is no finding that there was escapement of income. It was further contended that for the purpose of carrying on verification exercise, […]
Goodwill Management Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee, out of ignorance or inadvertence has omitted to mention the details of exempt income in the relevant ‘Schedule EI’. So, the ignorance of the assessee or inadvertent mistake committed by the assessee should not come in his way in claiming exemption, which is otherwise allowable […]
Sadruddin Tejani Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) The basic facts set out above are not in dispute. Without getting into the merits of the demands by the Revenue or the Application for Revision under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act by the Petitioner, it would be relevant to note that, it is not in […]
Aafreen Fatima Fazal Abbas Sayed Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) 15. This is a case where, in the Petitioner’s return for the Assessment Year A.Y 2018 – 19, the figure of long term capital gains of Rs. 3,07,60,800/- on surrender of tenancy rights in respect of earlier A.Y 2017-18 had inadvertently been copied by petitioner’s […]
AA520 Veerappampalayam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited Vs DCIT (Madras high court) The scope of an ‘intimation’ u/s 143 (1) (a) of the Act, extends only to the making of adjustments based upon errors apparent from the return of income and patent from the record The scope of an ‘intimation’ under Section 143 (1) […]
