Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prashant Prakash Nilawar Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prashant Prakash Nilawar Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Black Diary Notings Held Dumb & Reconciled – ITAT Mumbai Deletes Entire ₹7.23 Cr Additions in Search Case Search u/s 132 on the Rucha Group led to additions of ₹7.23 crore in the case of Prashant Prakash Nilawar, a land consultant, based on a black spiral diary & certain loose sheets allegedly evidencing unaccounted cash expenses. AO treated various notings in the diary as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C, unexplained money u/s 69A, & unexplained investment in jewellery u/s 69B, despite Assessee’s claim that the diary merely rec...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930