Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anup Kumar Vs JCIT (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anup Kumar Vs JCIT (Karnataka High Court) The Karnataka High Court quashed a penalty notice & order issued u/s 271DA for alleged violation of Section 269ST, holding that the initiation of penalty was time-barred in light of the binding ruling in PCIT v. K. Umesh Shetty [2025] 170 Taxmann.com 748 (Karnataka). Background The Petitioner challenged: Notice u/s 271DA dated 06.10.2024, Penalty order u/s 271DA dated 28.03.2025, & Notice of demand u/s 156 dated 28.03.2025, all issued by the JCIT, Central Range, Mangaluru for A.Y. 2022-23. The contention was that the penalty proceedings were ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case CA Not Liable for Client’s Bogus Entries: ICAI Clears Accountant with No Certification Role Suspicion ≠ Proof: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Multi-Bank Loan Fraud Case Delayed Retraction Backfires: ICAI Finds CA Guilty in Bogus Donation Tax Evasion Scheme Admission Seals Fate: ICAI Reprimands CA in Bogus Political Donation Scam View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930