Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Santlal Enterprise Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Santlal Enterprise Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Assessee filed return declaring NIL income. The case was selected for CASS scrutiny. AO issued notices & a draft assessment order proposing additions, & Assessee sought adjournment till 25.04.2021. However, AO passed the final order prematurely on 21.04.2021, making total addition of ₹2,73,30,000 – ₹2,50,00,000 u/s 56(2)(x) ₹23,30,000 u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE (as unexplained cash deposit, on protective basis) In appeal, CIT(A) deleted the ₹2.50 Cr addition u/s 56(2)(x), & the Revenue did not challenge this. However, CIT(A) sustained ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930