This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 34, 47 and 58 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 prescribing pecuniary jurisdictions are constitutionally valid
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rutu Mihir Panchal & Ors Vs Union of India & Ors (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rutu Mihir Panchal & Ors Vs Union of India & Ors (Supreme Court of India)
Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of Sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i) and 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 prescribing pecuniary jurisdictions of the district, state and national commissions on the basis of value of goods and services paid as consideration.
Facts- Constitutionality of Sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i) and 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 prescribing pecuniary jurisdictions of the district, state and national commissions on the basis of value of goods and services paid a...
Author Info
