This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Cash deposits during demonetization alone cannot justify income addition
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Anil Champalal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Anil Champalal Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
The case of Anil Champalal Jain vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) revolves around the contentious issue of cash deposits during the demonetization period and their tax implications. Mr. Anil Champalal Jain, a proprietor of M/s Satawat Textile, faced scrutiny over a significant cash deposit of ₹33 lakhs during this period. The Income Tax Department (ITD) added this amount to his income under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The ITAT Mumbai reviewed the case, noting that while the ITD alleged manipulation of accounts due to lack of post-demonetization cash s...
Author Info
