Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhaveshkumar Amulakhbhai Sonani Vs DCIT (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhaveshkumar Amulakhbhai Sonani Vs DCIT (ITAT Surat) ITAT Surat held that seized jewellery within the permissible limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No 1916 dated 11.05.1994 couldn’t be treated as undisclosed jewellery. Accordingly, addition u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act liable to be deleted. Facts- During the search action conducted at the above premises of assessee and other group members, various incriminating documents and evidences were seized. The case was selected for scrutiny, during assessment, AO noted that in conducting search action, gold jewellery of 738.69 grams having net weigh...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930