This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
NCLAT set aside order of IBC adjudicating authorities imposing penalty under Companies Act, 2013
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ashish Chaturvedi Vs Inox Leisure Limited (NCLAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ashish Chaturvedi Vs Inox Leisure Limited (NCLAT Delhi)
With regard to the argument of the Learned Counsel of the Appellants that the Adjudicating Authority has imposed the penalty on the two ex-directors by invoking provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and thus passed the Impugned Order by travelling beyond their jurisdiction, we are of the view that since the IA No. 1253/2020 was filed under the provisions of IBC, it would have served the requirement of law if any order regarding the penalty was imposed under the provisions of IBC. Moreover, it would have served the caus...
