This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Overseas Commission Agent is covered within the definition of term intermediary’
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- In re Midas Foods (P) Ltd (GST AAR Uttarakhand)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- AAR Uttarakhand, Advance Rulings
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
In re Midas Foods (P) Ltd (GST AAR Uttarakhand)
(a) Whether Overseas Commission Agent is covered within the definition of the term ‘intermediary’ as provided under section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017;
Overseas Commission Agent is covered within the definition of the term intermediary’ as provided under section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017;
(b) Whether services received by applicant from the Overseas Commission Agent falls within the meaning of the term ‘import of services’ as provided under section 2(11) of the IGST Act, 2017;
Services received by applicant from th...
