Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sutherland Global Services Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner CGST and Central Excise (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 4773 of 2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/09/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sutherland Global Services Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner CGST and Central Excise (Madras High Court)

Firstly, the Instructions issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs dated 07.12.2015, reveal a policy decision, not to allow utilisation of accumulated credit of EC and SHEC, but nowhere states that the credit has lapsed. The Board only says that the cesses have been phased out and since there is no new liability to pay these cesses, no vested right can be said to exist in relation to the past accumulated credit in the light of Rule 3(7)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 which stipulates that Cenvat Credit shall be utilised only as against payment of specified The request of the petitioner in that case has to be seen in this perspective and specifically in the light of the embargo placed by Rule 3(7)(b) as aforesaid. The Board could well have stated even at that juncture that the credit lapsed, but did not choose to do so.

Then again, the assessee and the Revenue has not anywhere indicated that the credit has lapsed, but only that, in the light of the embargo placed by Rule 3(7)(b), set off/credit as claimed could not be permitted.

Thirdly, even after the decision of the Division Bench, there has been no instructions/notification/circular from the Board till date to state that the accumulated credit has lapsed. Thus though there were a good many occasions that presented themselves to the Board to clearly stipulate that the accumulated credit had lapsed, this was not done. The petitioner had been permitted to carry forward the cesses in question without any move whatsoever to state that the credits could not be so carried forward, since they had lapsed. Not having done so, the provisions of Section 140 should be given full effect and meaning.

In the present case, the situation is entirely diffrent. The assessee only avails utilization of the credit accumulated, particularly since there is no prohibition in this regard either for the accumulation itself or for the utilization thereof under CGST.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031