Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sushila Ramasamy Vs. ACIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of CIT(A) dated 21.02.2007 for AY 1995-96. 2. It is seen that there was a delay of eighteen days in filing of this appeal by the- assessee, and an application for condonation of the delay was filed supported by an affidavit. After hearing both the parties the request for condonation of delay was allowed. 3. The grounds raised by the assessee in this appeal are as under. 1. The CIT(Appeals) erred, both in law and on the facts of the case, in sustaining the addition of Rs.4,68,85,840 to the income returned. 2. Having been admitted R...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930