This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
RCM on Freight Cannot Be Applied Blindly: CESTAT Explains Why Every Transporter Is Not a GTA
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Best Road Carriers Vs Principal Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Best Road Carriers Vs Principal Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi)
The issue of GST on freight has often been approached from a narrow perspective—whether the recipient falls within the specified category liable to pay tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM). However, before examining the recipient’s liability, an equally important and often ignored question deserves consideration: whether the service provider is a Goods Transport Agency (GTA) in the first place. The recent decision of CESTAT in Best Road Carriers v. Principal Commissioner, CGST Alwar brings this distinction into...




