Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harish Narang Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Harish Narang Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) Bogus Purchases Mean 69C, Not 37(1):Wrong Section, Short Tax: PCIT Right in Invoking 263 GST Scam Meets Income-Tax Law: 115BBE Hits Bogus Purchases- Accommodation Entries Can’t Get Normal Rate Shield-Section 69C Reigns Supreme Where Goods Never Arrived In Harish Narang Vs. PCIT , ITA No.3637/Del/2025, AY 2018-19, order dated 31.12.2025, Delhi ITAT upheld revision u/s 263 & dismissed Assessee’s appeal, holding that AO’s assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B was erroneous & prejudicial to the interest of Revenue for wrongly invoking section 37(1) instead...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930