Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharat Solanki Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bharat Solanki Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Buyer Can’t Be Taxed on Builder’s Confession Alone- Third-Party Excel & Statements Not Enough- No Cross-Examination, No Direct Evidence—₹12.87 Lakh 69C Additions Quashed by ITAT Mumbai Mumbai ITAT ‘B’ Bench in Bharat Solanki vs DCIT (ITA Nos. 6523 to 6525/Mum/2025, AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20, order dated 23-12-2025) allowed the assessee’s appeals and deleted additions made u/s 69C towards alleged “on-money” paid in cash for purchase of a shop, holding that additions based solely on third-party digital records and statements—without cross...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930