Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lalita Agarwal (Legal Heir of Late Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal) Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Lalita Agarwal (Legal Heir of Late Shri Subhash Chandra Agarwal) Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) In these five appeals, legal heir of Late Subhash Chandra Agarwal challenged reopening notices u/s 148 & consequential assessments framed entirely in the name & PAN of the deceased, despite the department being duly informed of the death on 23.01.2015 along with the death certificate. Tribunal noted that for all years, notices u/s 148 as well as assessment orders u/s 147/144 were issued exclusively in the name of the deceased &  on his PAN, even though parallel proceedings were independently car...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930