HC court upheld factual findings of lower authorities, emphasizing its limited jurisdiction under Section 260A of Income Tax Act. It clarified that it cannot reevaluate questions of fact in the absence of any grounds alleging perversity in the findings.
ITAT Chennai’s in Ethiraj Hotel Mart Vs DCIT held that as assessee declared excess stock as business income and provided a plausible explanation for its source, it should be taxed as ‘normal business income’ and not as ‘unexplained investment’ under section 69B.
Explore key promises made in past Union Budgets and track the government’s progress in fulfilling them. From MSME benefits to tax exemptions, a comprehensive overview awaits.
Stay informed with the latest Aadhaar updates! UIDAI announces amendments to the Aadhaar (Enrolment and Update) Regulations, 2016. Learn about changes, procedures, and more.
Stay informed about the Union Budget 2024-25 changes in ICES. Learn how the Directorate General of Systems manages updates and their impact on customs procedures.
As per Notification No. 26/2022 – Central Tax dated 26th December 2022 two new tables Table 14 and Table 15 were added in GSTR-1 to capture the details of the supplies made through e-commerce operators (ECO) on which e-commerce operators are liable to collect tax under section 52 of the Act or liable to pay […]
Explore importance of validating Show Cause Notices and Orders under CGST Act. Learn about time limits, authenticity, case laws, and key provisions for a robust understanding
MCA in India has introduced a revolutionary tool to simplify and expedite company incorporation process – SPICE+ (Simplified Proforma for Incorporating Company Electronically Plus) form.
Madras High Court Directs Timely Processing of Refund granted under section 5(2) of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 in Writ Petition: Muthukumaran Rangarajan Vs ITO
Read the Madras High Court’s recent ruling in Voora Property Developers Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT, challenging the Assessment Order dated 08.09.2022 for Assessment Year 2020-21. The court highlighted the failure to consider the petitioner’s response, directing a fresh assessment within four months.
