MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (Department for Promotion of Industry & Internal Trade) ORDER New Delhi, the 29th August, 2023 S.O. 3841(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 16 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016 (11 of 2016), the Central Government, after consulting the Bureau of Indian Standards, is of the opinion […]
Exploring SEBI’s 2023 amendment on disclosure requirements for Analysts/Institutional Investors Meet. Discover the implications for listed entities and investors.
Analysis of B.L. Pahariya Medical Store Vs State of U.P.: Allahabad High Court emphasizes the importance of personal hearing before passing adverse orders.
An in-depth analysis of SEBI’s consultation paper on enhancing flexibility in Social Stock Exchange (SSE) framework, its current status, challenges, and proposed solutions.
SEBI releases updated cybersecurity guidelines for MIIs. Dive deep into the robust security measures, practices, and compliance regulations for a secure securities market.
The Ministry of Finance has issued Notification No. 08/2023-Customs (ADD) Dated: 29th August, 2023 imposing anti-dumping duty on fishing net imports from China PR and Malaysia. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) New Delhi Notification No. 08/2023-Customs (ADD) | Dated: 29th August, 2023 G.S.R. 634(E).—Whereas, the designated authority, vide notification No. 7/22/2022-DGTR, dated the 30th September, 2022, published […]
Delhi High Court held that in terms of section 28(9) of the Customs Act the show cause notice needs to be adjudicated within a period of six months or within one year. Adjudication of notice after expiry of the said period is time-barred.
ITAT Delhi held that depreciation under section 32 of the Income Tax Act not available as the assessee is not carrying on any business activity.
CESTAT Ahmedabad it is settled legal position that cenvat credit on the sugar cess paid as part of CVD in respect of import of raw sugar is duly available.
CESTAT Chennai held that order of revocation of license as authorized courier unjustified as appellant didn’t played any role the impugned smuggling of gold and other commercial goods.
