ITAT Delhi held that social security contribution doesnt constitute income from salary in the hands of expatriate employees. Hence disallowance u/s 40(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on the same is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Pune held that interest paid on customs duty is allowable as deduction under section 43B of the Income Tax Act 1961.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that duty was paid on the clearance value on which demand was raised. Accordingly as duty was paid demand under rule 6(3)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 unsustainable.
In re SATS Food Solutions India Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) The applicant is engaged in the business of manufacture/production and supply of frozen food in institutional packs to companies in Aviation Industries, quick service restaurants, Hotels etc., across Ready To Eat (RTE)/ Ready To Cook (RTC)/ Processed and Semi Processed categories. The applicant has sought […]
In re Ess Ess Kay Engineering Company Pvt (GST AAAR Punjab) Appellate Authority uphold the order AAR/GST/PB/016 dated 16th of August, 2022 issued by the Authority for Advance Ruling, Punjab and the appeal filed by the appellant M/s ESS ESS KAY ENGINEERING COMPANY PVT LTD. The appellant has conveniently overlooked the basic nature of the […]
Form PAS-03 which was closed for filing in Version-2 on 20.01.2023 and launched in Version-3 on 23.01.2023, and whose due dates for filing fall between 20.01.2023 and 28.02.2023, can also be filed without payment of additional fees till 31.03.2023.
Save for your future while locked in guaranteed benefits with proper investments.
These regulations may be called the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Second Amendment Regulations, 2023.
Inspection of Books of Account and other records of the captioned company was conducted under section 206(5) of the Companies Act, 2013. During the inspection, it was reportedly observed by the Inspecting Officer that the company has not complied with the provisions of section 118(10) r/w Secretarial Standards. a. The subject company and its officers […]
Revenue Department had neither sought any new information nor made a reference to new material on record. Held that, a change in opinion that does not satisfy the jurisdictional foundation under Section 147 of the IT Act.
