Sonjoli Construction Co. Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) Petitioner submitted that the petitioner was entitled to apply under the SVLDR Scheme and he filed the timely application and deposited the due tax amount under the said Scheme. However, application filed by the petitioner has been rejected only an erroneous ground that audit had […]
PVR Ltd Vs CIT (Delhi High Court) HC held that ITAT erred in law in holding that the difference between the price at which stock options were offered to employees of the appellant company under ESOP and ESPS and the prevailing market price of the stock on the date of grant of such options was […]
Shanu Events Vs State of U.P (Allahabad High Court) Perusal of the e-way bill reveals, the petitioner made an inadvertent error in applying for the e-way bill. After mentioning the place of shipment to ‘Kumbh Mela, Haridwar, Uttarakhand’, the words ‘Madhya Pradesh – 483501’ were filled up. The address having been thus wrongly filled up […]
Banks provide short term finance and meet the liquidity requirements of borrowers immediately and also on a wide range level. Once set in motion, it is easily available to industry and the most widely used finance.
Mauritius was successfully upgraded on Recommendation 15 to ‘Largely Compliant’ and With this technical compliance upgrade, Mauritius is now Compliant or Largely Compliant with all 40 FATF Recommendations.
Priya Vs ITO (Allahabad High Court) Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2/ Income Tax Department. This writ petition has been filed praying, inter alia, for the following relief:- “(i) Issue a writ, or direction in the nature of certiorari […]
ITAT held that the assessee has not wilfully delayed the filing of appeal and we find that there is no negligence on the part of the assessee, as the assessee has filed appeal manually in time.
NCLAT held that Banker’s Certificate is not mandatorily required to trigger CIRP under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 (Code).
Pegasus Pharmaco India Pvt Ltd. Vs Commissioner Central Goods & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) a) Balaji has not commenced commercial production prior to the cut-off date of 31.3.2010 even though a single invoice was issued and therefore, it was not entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification nor has it claimed it until a […]
CBDT notifies Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission under Section 10(46) of income Tax Act, 1961 vide Notification No. 108/2022 – Income Tax | Dated: 5th September, 2022 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi Notification No. 108/2022 – Income Tax | Dated: 5th September, 2022 S.O. 4155(E).—In exercise of the powers […]
