CBDT notifies National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development (NBFID) under section 10(48D) of Income Tax Act, 1961 vide Notification No. 31/2022 – Income Tax Dated: 18th April, 2022. MINISTRY OF OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi, the 18th April, 2022 Notification No. 31/2022 – Income Tax S.O. 1825(E).—In exercise […]
Rainbow Stones Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court) Under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017, it is provided that, every claim for refund filed by any person before, on or after the appointed day (i.e. 01.07.2017), for refund of any amount of CENVAT credit, duty, tax, interest or any other amount paid […]
In order to strengthen the process of security creation and monitoring of security created, asset cover and covenants of the non-convertible securities, SEBI vide circular dated August 13, 2021 had specified the manner of recording of charges by Issuers and manner of monitoring by Debenture Trustees (DTs), Credit Rating Agencies, etc.
(1) This Act may be called the Chartered Accountants, the Cost and Works Accountants and the Company Secretaries (Amendment) Act, 2022. (2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint, and different dates may be appointed for different provisions of this Act and any reference in any provision to the commencement of this Act shall be construed as a reference to the coming into force of that provision.
On a review, it has been decided to permit banks to reckon Government securities as Level 1 HQLA under FALLCR within the mandatory SLR requirement up to 16 per cent of their NDTL. Accordingly, the total HQLA carve out from the mandatory SLR, which can be reckoned for meeting LCR requirement will be 18 per cent of NDTL (2 per cent MSF plus 16 per cent FALLCR).
Applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The statement of the applicant under Section 70 of the C.G.S.T Act, 2017 is self-implicatory which was extracted by coercion and made under duress.
PCIT Vs Consortium Nussli Comfort Net (Delhi High Court) Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Laxman Das Khandelwal (supra) has clearly stated that the scope of Section 292BB is to make service of notice having certain infirmities to be proper and valid. However, the section does not save complete absence of notice. For section […]
