ITAT Bangalore held that ignorance of law is not a ground for condonation of delay, hence delay of 879 days in filing of an appeal without any sufficient reason shown is not condonable. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
ITAT Bangalore held that reopening of assessment under section 148 after expiry of four years without failure on part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts is invalid and hence liable to be quashed.
ITAT Mumbai held that CIT(A) rightly deleted addition towards bogus purchases since assessee proved genuineness of purchases by submitting various details/ documents. Accordingly, appeal of the revenue dismissed.
Gauhati High Court stays GST notice against Bhagya Kalita, questioning jurisdiction under Section 74(1) of the CGST Act. Case to be heard on 09/12/2024.
In the abovementioned matter HC observed that all three conditions mentioned in section 220 (2A) were not co-existed and hence writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
In the recent ruling Hon’ble HC have observed that penalty proceedings, initiated u/s 271 D is barred by delay & laches as period of limitation starts from the reference made by ITO to Addl. CIT.
ITAT Raipur held that AO has passed the final assessment order u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 153B(b) of the Act without seeking a prior approval of the same by the Jt. CIT u/s. 153D of the Income Tax Act and hence the order so passed is liable to be quashed.
Bombay High Court quashes CBDT order denying delay condonation for Bharat Education Society, citing procedural lapses and lack of personal hearing.
Bombay HC ruled on Anandkumar Dhanraj Rathod’s tax case, addressing natural justice claims and directing him to appeal the assessment order under IT Act.
ITAT Chennai dismisses FLsmidth’s appeal, upholding PCIT’s order for reassessment due to lack of verification by AO.
