Corporate Law : Supreme Court rules in Ashish Kakkar case that an arrest memo does not fulfill the legal requirement of furnishing grounds of arre...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court quashed an FIR against MP Imran Pratapgadhi, emphasizing courts' and police's duty to protect freedom of speech ...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court acquits six in post-Godhra riots case, citing lack of incriminating evidence and wrongful conviction by the Gujarat ...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court advises High Courts to prioritize criminal appeals of elderly accused on bail, especially in old cases, to ensure fa...
Company Law : SC rules that NCLT cannot decide on public law matters under MMDR Act in IBC cases, reaffirming High Court jurisdiction under Arti...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Income Tax : Government addresses Supreme Court judgment on tax exemptions for clergy and its implications on Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) u...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rejects regularisation of illegal constructions, irrespective of occupancy or investments, and calls for action agai...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court Collegium recommends three advocates—Ajay Digpaul, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, and Shwetasree Majumder—for ...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Corporate Law : SC held that a duly signed cheque, even if filled by someone other than drawer, can invoke Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments A...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rules in Batliboi v HPCL that arbitral damages must reflect actual loss, not be a windfall. Discusses formulae flaws...
Income Tax : Supreme Court sets aside High Court ruling in S.M. Overseas tax case, restores ITAT order on reassessment under Sections 147/148 o...
Service Tax : Supreme Court allows Fork Media's exemption plea, seeks clarity on Cenvat Credit usage rejected earlier by High Court due to lack ...
Custom Duty : Supreme Court grants benefit of doubt to Gastrade International due to inconclusive evidence in HSD vs Base Oil classification dis...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : No restrictions on joint bank accounts or nominations for the queer community, as clarified by the Supreme Court and RBI in August...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court of India introduces new procedures for case adjournments effective 14th February 2024, detailing strict guidelines a...
Corporate Law : Explore the updated FAQs on the implementation of the EPFO judgment dated 04.11.2022. Understand proof requirements, pension compu...
Income Tax : Comprehensive guide on CBDT's directives for AOs concerning the Abhisar Buildwell Supreme Court verdict. Dive into its implication...
Supreme Court emphasizes reasonable cause for TDS non-deduction under Section 271C. Highlights interplay of Sections 4, 5, 9, and 192 in integrated tax code.
Calls for a High Court Bench in West UP remain ignored. SC urged to intervene in judicial disparities affecting millions. Know the legal and political context.
Supreme Court reaffirms that charitable trust registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act should be based on proposed activities, not actual activities at the time of application.
Smt. Syeda Rahimunnisa and Syed Hyder Hussaini are wife and husband whereas the respondent no. 1(a) to 1(f) are the legal heirs of one late Haji Mian being mother, wife, sons and daughters respectively.
The Supreme Court dismissed Madhumilan Syntex Ltd.’s appeal against prosecution for delayed TDS payment under the Income Tax Act. Read the case summary.
The Supreme Court examined tax issues in Apollo Tyres Ltd. vs. CIT, including the role of assessing officers under Section 115-J and eligibility of UTI income under Section 32AB.
SC upheld CIT’s revision under Section 263, ruling ₹3,66,649 as taxable income. The assessment was found erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.
Supreme Court upholds P&H HC ruling: Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules cannot apply retrospectively. ITC rights are protected before statutory amendment.
Supreme Court held that in disciplinary proceedings, the Disciplinary Authority is not required to be recorded detailed reasons in the order imposing punishment if he accepts the findings recorded by the Enquiry Officer.
Supreme Court held that no penalty under section 271AAA(1) of the Income Tax Act when undisclosed income during course of search is admitted and paid tax with interest. Accordingly, penalty u/s. 271AAA(1) set aside.
