Corporate Law : Explore the impact of builder insolvency on homebuyers in India and the challenges within the insolvency resolution process. Learn...
Corporate Law : FedEx's appeal for CIRP against Zipker was dismissed by NCLT, ruling the company's name must be restored under specific provisions...
Corporate Law : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of ke...
Corporate Law : Explore significant legal developments, Supreme Court verdicts, and detailed analyses in the Q4 2023 newsletter. Stay informed on ...
Corporate Law : Explore the vital role of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in protecting employee rights during corporate insolvency, high...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Company Law : The Government defines the 30-day time limit for filing representations before NCLAT under the Companies Act, with no cases pendin...
Company Law : Government response on political appointments in NCLT/NCLAT and reasons behind delays in IBC case disposal....
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that granting waiver u/s. 244(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 justified in a petition alleging oppression and mi...
Corporate Law : Thus, we do not find any error in the impugned order for the purpose of interference, therefore, the present appeal is found to be...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi held that when the debt invoking the guarantee falls between the 10A period application u/s. 7 of the Insolvency and B...
Company Law : NCLAT Chennai held that payments from Successful Resolution Applicant will be done on pro-rata basis amongst the creditors but the...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi held that financial creditor entitled to file an application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code eve...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
NCLAT Chennai held that fees is payable to Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) from the date he took charge of IRP till the date of appointment of new Resolution Professional. Accordingly, directed to pay additional fees from 53 days.
NCLT Kolkata held that a secured creditor having possession over the assets of the corporate debtor does not lose its rights to file an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
The bills so assigned to the Financial Creditors and the amounts against such bills was disbursed. In the process of transactions, the Applicants stated to have paid a sum of Rs. 2,34,17,965/- on various dates.
On 21.04.2017, a Share Purchase Agreement was executed, wherein the erstwhile Directors sold their equity in favour of Accord Mediplus Pvt. Ltd. Respondent Nos.6 to 12 also resigned from the Trust on 01.09.2017.
According to the appellant, Respondent Nos. 1 through 26 were creditors in the class of the Project Spaze Arrow, and in order to start a CIRP against the CD, they filed an application under Section 7 that only pertained to the Project Spaze Arrow.
NCLAT Delhi held that a Decree Holder falls within the purview of the Financial Creditor under the Code, if the decree is based on a financial debt. Accordingly, dismissal of petition u/s. 7 of IBC not justified.
NCLAT Delhi held that admitting application under section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of CIRP for default in not completing project and handing over units within time justified.
NCLAT Delhi held that imposition of 5% penalty on average turnover/ receipt related to EWS by Competition Commission of India [CCI] under section 27 of the Competition Act, 2002 cannot be termed as unreasonable or excessive.
CIRP against the Corporate Debtor commenced vide order dated 09.04.2024. On 17.04.2024, Resolution Professional issued public announcement calling upon creditors to submit their claims.
NCLAT Delhi held that the pendency of proceedings before the NCLT for approval of the scheme of arrangement does in no manner either shall suspend the default committed by the Corporate Debtor or preclude the Financial Creditor to proceed with Section 7 application.
