Corporate Law : India’s Social Security Code consolidates multiple labour welfare laws into a unified framework covering organised, unorganised,...
Corporate Law : The Code on Wages and the 2026 Rules introduce a uniform wage definition and cap exclusions at 50% of total remuneration. Employer...
Corporate Law : India’s new Labour Codes introduce a uniform wage definition and 50% cap on exclusions, affecting PF, gratuity, bonus, and salar...
Corporate Law : The paper examines whether recent labour law reforms deliver real gender equality or merely formal compliance. It concludes that d...
Corporate Law : Dhara Verma Abstract The labour welfare laws in India provide essential maternity and paternity benefits to workers which demonstr...
Corporate Law : The ruling clarifies that digital processes are encouraged but not mandatory, ensuring workers rights are protected even through p...
Company Law : The law removes sector-based exclusions and extends minimum wage protection to all employees. It confirms universal coverage acros...
Corporate Law : The FAQs explain the uniform wage definition and the 50% allowance cap across all Codes. Gratuity applies prospectively from 21 No...
Corporate Law : The Code retains trade union rights, collective bargaining, and strike provisions with notice requirements. It confirms continued ...
Corporate Law : Raising factory and licensing thresholds does not remove safety and welfare protections. All establishments with 10 or more worker...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court held that compensatory allowances form part of “ordinary wages” for overtime calculation. Executive circular...
Corporate Law : The Karnataka High Court has set aside a prosecution order against Natural Remedies Private Limited. The court found that the Comm...
Corporate Law : Punjab & Haryana High Court directs that temporary employees cannot be replaced by another set of temporary staff but can be repla...
Corporate Law : The Telangana High Court addressed jurisdiction and employment status in Godrej Agrovet Ltd. Vs Presiding Officer. Key aspects of ...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court sets aside the Industrial Court's interim relief, reinstating employer rights to transfer and discipline emp...
Corporate Law : The Industrial Relations Code (Amendment) Bill, 2026 (Bill No. 33 of 2026), introduced in the Lok Sabha, seeks to amend section 10...
Corporate Law : The government has notified a clear wage ceiling for supervisory roles. Earnings above this limit remove such employees from worke...
Corporate Law : The Government has issued draft Coal Mines Safety Regulations, 2026 under the OSHWC Code, detailing safety standards, certificatio...
Corporate Law : The draft Central Rules lay down detailed procedures to operationalised the Industrial Relations Code, replacing older dispute and...
Corporate Law : The notification introduces draft rules under the OSH Code to unify and modernise labour regulation. The key takeaway is a shift t...
The Allahabad High Court ruled that workers in a statutory canteen operated by a contractor are not employees of Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. under labor laws.
MP High Court upholds Labor Court’s authority to include new parties in labor disputes. Manjeet Global Pvt Ltd liable post-unit transfer.
Bombay High Court rejects plea of Venkatesh Seena Naidu in dispute over workman status under Industrial Disputes Act due to delay and lack of merit in the petition.
Kerala High Court clarifies jurisdiction under the Contract Labour Act, ruling on employer liability for contractor wage defaults. Key legal principles analyzed.
Chhattisgarh High Court quashes proceedings against Aditya Jajodia and others in a case under the Industrial Disputes Act, citing lack of government sanction.
The Delhi High Court rejects the regularization plea of Kanchanjunga building employees, upholding the Industrial Tribunal’s decision on employer-employee relationship.
Madras High Court ruled on the union office relocation at Madras Gymkhana Club, affirming no change in worker service conditions under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Madras High Court ruled Industrial Tribunal exceeded its authority in reviewing dismissal punishment under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act.
The Karnataka High Court examines whether an Executive Secretary qualifies as a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act, ruling against reinstatement and compensation.
Karnataka HC set aside Labour Court order, confirming FDC Ltd.’s termination of employee for disobedience of lawful transfer.
