Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/s First Flight Courier Ltd. (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : STA No. 48 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/01/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Section 76 provides for penalty for failure to pay the amount while Section 78 provides for penalty for suppressing the taxable value. Section 78 is, thus, more comprehensive and provides for higher amount. Even if technically, the scope of sections 76 and 78 is different, penalty under Section 76 may not be justified if penalty had already been imposed under Section 78; the appellate authority was within its jurisdiction not to levy penalty under section 76 of the Act having regard to the fact that penalty equal to service tax had already been imposed under section 78 of the Act.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

STA No. 48 of 2010

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, COMMISSIONER ATE

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031