This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
SCN cannot be issued Notice under Proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act if no Suppression of Facts
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Haridwar Roorkee Development Authority Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Haridwar Roorkee Development Authority Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
It is observed that demand in question pertains to the period 2012-13 and 2013-14. The show cause notice is given in April 2018 i.e. much beyond the period of normal limitation. The extended period can only be invoked in terms of proviso to Section 73 (1) of Finance Act, 1994 i.e. only in the cases where ingredients of fraud, collusion, willful mis-statement, suppression of facts etc. with an intent to evade tax are present. We observe that there is no evidence adduced on rec...
