Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Vs. Shri. Swapnil Asnodkar (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise Vs. Shri. Swapnil Asnodkar (CESTAT Mumbai) Further as held by the Honorable High Court of Calcutta in case of Sourav Ganguly Vs. UOI [2016 (43) STR 482 (CAL)] that the services of brand promotion before 01.07.2010 are not taxable. Same views has been taken by the Tribunal in case of Commissioner of Service Tax Delhi Vs. Shriya Saran [2014 (36) STR 641 (TRI)]. We also find that as per the clause 4 and 4.8 of the agreement only 10% of the total sum receivable is towards Promotion of Brands of Goods, services and events and the remaining is towards mat...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930