Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : L & T Limited v. CCE (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Due to difference of opinion between the two Members of the Bench over the divisibility of the works contract in question, the matter was being referred to Third Member. RELEVANT EXTRACTS: The Registry is directed to place the matter before the Hon’ble President to refer the following issue to third Member:- Whether the contracts of IOCL and BPCL with L&T can be held to be divisible and therefore service tax can be levied on the services part as held by Member (Technical) or whether the contracts between the appellants and IOCL & BPCL to be held as not divisable and therefore not...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930