Case Law Details
Case Name : L & T Limited v. CCE (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Ahmedabad
Due to difference of opinion between the two Members of the Bench over the divisibility of the works contract in question, the matter was being referred to Third Member.
RELEVANT EXTRACTS:
The Registry is directed to place the matter before the Hon’ble President to refer the following issue to third Member:-
Whether the contracts of IOCL and BPCL with L&T can be held to be divisible and therefore service tax can be levied on the services part as held by Member (Technical) or whether the contracts between the appellants and IOCL & BPCL to be held as not divisable and therefore not...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

