This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT Remands CENVAT Credit Dispute as Rule 6 Reversal Was Not Properly Examined
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Tirupati Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Tirupati Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
The appeal was filed by M/s Tirupati Co-operative Bank Ltd., a provider of banking and other financial services, against the order upholding the confirmation of service tax demands, interest, and penalties relating to the availment of CENVAT credit for the periods 2005-06 to 2010-11. The dispute concerned the availment and retention of CENVAT credit on inputs and input services commonly used for providing both taxable and exempt services, particularly the receipt of interest in the course of render...
Author Info
