Case Law Details
Case Name : Periyasamy Arunachalam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Periyasamy Arunachalam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
U/s 115BBE Amendment Not Retrospective – ITAT Chennai Restricts Tax to 30% for Pre-01.04.2017 Transactions
In this case, the assessee faced additions under Section 68 for cash deposits during the demonetization period, and the Assessing Officer applied tax @ 60% under Section 115BBE. The CIT(A) upheld this higher rate.
However, before the ITAT Chennai, the assessee argued that the amended higher rate of 60% under Section 115BBE (introduced w.e.f. 15.12.2016) is applicable only from A.Y. 2018-19 onwards, and not for A.Y. 2017-18.
The Tribunal r...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


