Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Cummins India Limited Vs. Dy.CIT (ITAT Pune)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 277 & 1412/PN/07
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/02/2011
Related Assessment Year : 2003-04 & 2004-05
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Summary of the case:- Assessee has an option when there is arithmetical mean involved while computing the ‘arm’s length price’ and it happens only if more than one price is determined by the most appropriate method. The First Proviso becomes operational where more than one comparable price is determined. The assessee at his option can make claim of deduction out of the arithmetic mean not exceeding 5%.

In The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Bench ‘A’, Pune

  1. Cummins India Limited Vs. Dy.CIT (ITA No. 277 & 1412/ PN/07) (Asst. Year 2003-04 & 2004-05)
  2. Dy.CIT Vs. Cummins India Limited (ITA No. 148 /PN/07) (Asstt. Year 2003-04)
  3. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031