Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : B. Somasundaram Vs JCIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
B. Somasundaram Vs JCIT (Madras High Court) Petitioner challenged the notice issued u/s 271D for for violation of Sec 269SS of IT Act. Petitioner contended that already a regular assessment order has been passed wherein, proposals were made for imposing penalty u/s 270A, 271A, 271B & 271AAC. Assessment order was later revised by invoking Sect 148 and another Assessment order has been passed, wherein, there is no proposal for imposing any penalty. Since the notice is vague, proposing imposition of penalty u/s 271D without any merits was questioned. Reliance was placed on the following decis...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Allows Section 35D & ESOP Claims, But Upholds Disallowance of Share Issue Expenses Wrong Code in Form 10AB Cannot Defeat U/s 80G Registration: ITAT Restores Application Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930