Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Radhika Mehra (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Radhika Mehra (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi: Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Explained by Recorded Jewellery Sales – Section 68 Not Attracted; Capital Introduced under PMGKDS Not Taxable Again The Delhi Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the deletion of additions made under section 68 read with section 115BBE for AY 2017-18. The Assessing Officer had treated cash deposits of ₹1.45 crore during the demonetisation period as unexplained money, alleging bogus cash sales of jewellery and inadequate verification of purchases. The CIT(A), after admitting additiona...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930