This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 40A(3) : Cash payment to Labour contractor on principal-to-principal basis not allowable
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shree Buildcon & Associates Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Shree Buildcon & Associates Vs JCIT (ITAT Pune)
It is found as an admitted position that the assessee paid the amounts in question to the labour contractors in violation of section 40A(3) of the Act. The case of the assessee is that the payments were covered under clause (k) of Rule 6DD, which provides that no disallowance will be made where the payment is made by any person to his agent who is required to make payment in cash for goods or services on behalf of such persons.
The important point to be noted in such cases is that the payment must be by the assessee to his ag...






