Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Surajit Ghosh Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Surajit Ghosh Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Summary: The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an inadvertent error committed by the assessee while filing the return of income could be rectified under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act. The assessee had mistakenly selected the acquisition period of certain mutual fund units as “on or after 31.01.2018” instead of “on or before 31.01.2018” in Schedule 112A, resulting in incorrect computation of long-term capital gains and a tax demand. The Assessing Officer rejected the rectification application on...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 143(2) Assessment Quashed for Notice Issued by Officer Without Jurisdiction: ITAT Delhi Section 148 Reassessment Quashed as ₹50 Lakh Threshold Not Met for Same Transaction: ITAT Delhi Can Section 148A Reassessment Be Based Solely on Red-Flagged Information? No Capital Gains Without Transfer Under Development Agreement: ITAT Pune Section 148 Reassessment Quashed for Skipping Approved Section 148A(a) Inquiry: Chhattisgarh HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031