Case Law Details
Sobha Developers Ltd. Vs DCIT (Karnataka High Court)
From perusal of the relevant extract of Section 115JB, it is evident that Sub-Section (1) of Section 115JB provides the mode of computation of the total income of the assessee and tax payable on the assessee under Section 115JB of the Act. Sub-Section (5) of Section 115JB provides that save as otherwise provided in this section, all other provisions of this Act shall apply to every assessee being a company mentioned in this Section. Therefore, any expenditure relatable to earning of income exempt under Section 10(2A ) and Section 10(35) of the Act is disallowed under Section 14A of the Act and is added back to book profit under clause (f) of Section 115JB of the Act, the same would amount to doing violence with the statutory provision viz., Sub-Section (1) and (5) of Section 115JB of the Act. It is also pertinent to mention here that the amounts mentioned in clauses (a ) to (i ) of explanation to Section 115JB(2 ) are debited to the statement of profit and loss account, then only the provisions of Section 115JB would apply. The disallowance under Section 14A of the Act is a notional disallowance and therefore, by taking recourse to Section 14A of the Act, the amount cannot be added back to book profit under clause (f) of Section 115JB of the Act. It is also pertinent to mention here that similar view, which has been taken by this court in Gokaldas Images (P ) Ltd. supra was also taken by High Court of Bombay in ‘THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 VS. M/S BENGAL FINANCE & INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD. I.T.A.N0.337/2013. It is pertinent to note that in Rolta India Ltd., the Supreme Court was dealing with the issue of chargeability of interest under Section 234B and 234C of the act on failure to pay advance tax in respect of tax payable under Section 115JA/ 1153B of the Act and therefore, the aforesaid decision has no impact on the issue involved in this appeal. Similarly, in MAXOPP Investment Ltd., supra the Supreme Court has dealt with Section 14A of the Act and has not dealt with Section 115JB of the Act. Therefore, the aforesaid decision also does not apply to the fact situation of the case.
In view of preceding analysis, the substantial questions of law framed by a bench of this court are answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. In the result, the order passed by the tribunal dated 09.01.2015 insofar as it pertains to the findings recorded against the assessee is hereby quashed.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
This appeal under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been preferred by the assessee. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2008-09. The appeal was admitted by a bench of this Court vide order dated 01.03.2016 on the following substantial question of law:
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
