Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT, Vs Smt. Prem Anand (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 3514/DEL/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/04/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ld. CIT(A) has rightly observed that the assessee is not required to explain source of source of the fund gets buttressed by the amendment made in section 68 with effect from 01.04.2013, which empowers the AO to examine source of source in case of share application money from 01.04.2013 and no other cases prior to that. This amendment further does not give power to the AO to examine source of source of non-share capital cases and that too prior to 01.04.2013. Undisputedly, the assessee has given complete addresses and credit worthiness of the persons from whom she has taken loans.”

FULL TEXT OF ITAT ORDER

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the Order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XXVI, New Delhi dated 11.3.2014 pertaining to Assessment Year 2008-09 on the following grounds:-

1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing the assessee to file fresh evidence under the Rule 46A without appreciating the fact that the assessee was given two opportunities for filing the details during the assessment proceedings.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031