Case Law Details
Case Name : Neo Sports Broadcast Pvt.Ltd Vs CIT (TDS) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11, 2011-12
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Brief of the Case
The Subsidiary Co. had mere reimbursed the Bank Gurantee Commission to its holding Co. & there is no money borrowed or debt incurred. Therefore, provisions of sec. 2(28A) and sec. 194A do not apply. Payment made to holding Co. is not “income by way of interest”. The impugned receipt would be in the nature of reimbursement of expenses incurred by it & therefore does not attract TDS provision of Section 194A.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.