Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashokkumar Prahladbai Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ashokkumar Prahladbai Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Developer’s Admission Can’t Bind Buyer: On-Money Addition Fails Without Direct Evidence: ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes ₹19.62 Lakh- Excel Sheet & Third-Party Statement Not Enough: ITAT Gives Relief to Property Purchaser The Ahmedabad “A” Bench of the ITAT, vide order dated 01.01.2026 in Ashokkumar Prahladbai Patel v. DCIT (ITA No.1300/Ahd/2025, AY 2016-17), allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted the addition of ₹19,62,500 made u/s 69A on account of alleged on-money payment for purchase of immovable property. The reassessment was init...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930