This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Rule 8D r.w. section 14A can not be applied for years prior to A.Y. 2008-09 so invoking of provision of section 263 of the IT Act not justified
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sri Kedar Nath Agarwal, Kolkata Vs D.C.I.T., Circle-35 (ITAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2005-06
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Since the assessment year involved in this appeal is 2005-06 Rule 8D of the IT Rules is not applicable in the present case keeping in view of the decision of the Honourable Bombay High Court in the case of Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Pvt. Ltd. In this case the ld. CIT-Admn has issued jurisdiction u/s 263 of the IT Act based on the order of the ITAT, Special Bench, which has been subsequently over ruled by Hon’ble Bombay High Court (supra). Therefore we are of the view that invoking of provision of section 263 of the IT Act is not justifiable in the facts and circumstances of the case. Hence we s...
