Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Lorven Projects Limited (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Lorven Projects Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad: Rule 27 Cannot Be Used to Raise New Jurisdictional Challenge; Release Deed Issue Remanded for Verification of Loss Claim The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench dealt with Revenue’s appeal and the assessee’s Rule 27 application for AY 2015-16 in the case of Lorven Projects Ltd. The assessee attempted to challenge the validity of the assessment by invoking Rule 27, contending that NFAC lacked jurisdiction as notices were issued prior to the CBDT notification conferring such powers. The Tribunal...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930