Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Lorven Projects Limited (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Lorven Projects Limited (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad: Rule 27 Cannot Be Used to Raise New Jurisdictional Challenge; Release Deed Issue Remanded for Verification of Loss Claim The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench dealt with Revenue’s appeal and the assessee’s Rule 27 application for AY 2015-16 in the case of Lorven Projects Ltd. The assessee attempted to challenge the validity of the assessment by invoking Rule 27, contending that NFAC lacked jurisdiction as notices were issued prior to the CBDT notification conferring such powers. The Tribunal...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930